The integration of computational intelligence techniques with Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) has emerged as a promising field of research, aiming to enhance the interaction between humans and machines. This paper explores computational intelligence approaches that are successfully applied to BCIs, focusing on their development and potential applications. We begin by discussing the fundamental concepts and challenges of BCIs, highlighting the need for advanced computational techniques to overcome the limitations of traditional BCI systems. Subsequently, we delve into various computational intelligence methods, including machine learning, neural networks, and evolutionary algorithms, which have shown remarkable effectiveness in processing and interpreting neural signals. The paper further examines the integration of these approaches into BCI design, emphasizing the importance of adaptive and robust algorithms for real-world applications. Additionally, we discuss the current challenges and future directions in this area, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to achieve practical and efficient BCIs.
Thomas, S. Computational Intelligence Approaches for Brain-Computer Interfaces. Transactions on Applied Soft Computing, 2020, 2, 10. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.tasc.20200614
AMA Style
Thomas S. Computational Intelligence Approaches for Brain-Computer Interfaces. Transactions on Applied Soft Computing; 2020, 2(1):10. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.tasc.20200614
Chicago/Turabian Style
Thomas, Sophia 2020. "Computational Intelligence Approaches for Brain-Computer Interfaces" Transactions on Applied Soft Computing 2, no.1:10. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.tasc.20200614
APA style
Thomas, S. (2020). Computational Intelligence Approaches for Brain-Computer Interfaces. Transactions on Applied Soft Computing, 2(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.tasc.20200614
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Farwell, D. A., & Donchin, E. (1988). Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis involving EEG-based command of cursor movement. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 70(6), 510-523.
Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Kurth, N., & Mai, K. (2008). Single trial analysis of EEG: the challenge of high accuracy. In BCI 2008: Systems and brain modeling (pp. 69-76). Springer.
Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J. R., & Donchin, E. (2004). Using electroencephalography to provide a direct interface to computers. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 21(4), 26-34.
Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(7), 1248-1259.
Schüssler, B., Schlögl, A., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2004). Comparison of linear and nonlinear autoregressive models for the classification of motor imagery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51(5), 807-814.
Serruya, M. D.,اصف, C. D., Donoghue, J. P., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2002). Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature, 416(6879), 141-142.
Farwell, D. A., Donchin, E., & Srinivasan, R. (2004). The P300 as a basis for a brain-computer interface. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(4), 628-633.
Schalk, G., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., & Cohen, L. G. (2007). Toward a brain interface for indirect control of physical objects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2261-2270.
Farwell, D. A., Donchin, E., & Srinivasan, R. (1988). Brain-computer interfaces: using thoughts to control a cursor. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 35(3), 191-198.